novaĵoj

hejmen > Kompanio > NOVAĴOJ > novaĵoj > Satellite OBC Selection Guide (IV): Weight and Size Constraints – Adapting to Satellite Platform Specifications

Satellite OBC Selection Guide (IV): Weight and Size Constraints – Adapting to Satellite Platform Specifications

Satellites have strict weight and size limitations (e.g., nanosatellites ≤ 10kg). As the core component of a satellite, the OBC’s weight and size must fully match the specifications of the satellite platform (nanosatellite, microsatellite, minisatellite); otherwise, it will affect the satellite’s orbit control, payload capacity, and launch costs.
 
Satellite OBC Selection Guide (IV): Weight and Size Constraints – Adapting to Satellite Platform Specifications
 

OBC Weight and Size Requirements for Different Satellite Platforms

 

Different types of satellite platforms have significantly varying constraints on OBC weight and size. The specific requirements are as follows:
 
Satellite Type Satellite Weight Limit OBC Weight Requirement OBC Size Requirement Typical Product Example (Reference)
Nanosatellite (e.g., CubeSat) ≤ 10kg 100-200g Compatible with standardized stacking structures (e.g., PC104 interface) and featuring a compact size. For example: width ≤ 90mm, length ≤ 95mm, height ≤ 18mm NANOSATPRO: 100g, dimensions 95mm (L) × 90mm (W) × 18mm (H)
Microsatellite 10-100kg 200-500g Equipped with a lightweight housing (to protect internal components). Connector positions must adapt to the satellite’s wiring layout to avoid wiring chaos. Size can be slightly relaxed but must be controlled. MICROSATPRO: 280g, dimensions 130mm (L) × 126mm (W) × 18mm (H)
Minisatellite 100-500kg 500-1000g Customizable size based on the overall satellite design, balancing expandability (e.g., reserved interfaces for future upgrades) and lightweight properties. No strict adherence to standardized sizes is required. -

 

Satellite OBC Selection Guide (IV): Weight and Size Constraints – Adapting to Satellite Platform Specifications

 

Design Principles for OBC Lightweight and Miniaturization

 

To meet the weight and size limitations of satellite platforms, OBC design must follow these principles:
 
  1. Material Selection: Use lightweight composite materials (e.g., carbon fiber, aluminum alloy) for the housing instead of traditional heavy metals (e.g., steel) to reduce weight while ensuring structural strength. For example, MICROSATPRO’s housing adopts carbon fiber composite, which reduces weight by 30% compared to traditional aluminum alloy housings.
  2. Integrated Design: Reduce the number of discrete components and adopt "System-in-Package (SiP)" technology — integrating core components such as processors, FPGAs, and memory into a single chip or module to minimize the overall OBC size. For example, OBCs for nanosatellites often integrate processors and FPGAs on the same PCB to reduce space occupied by inter-board connections.
  3. Interface Standardization: Comply with general aerospace interface standards (e.g., PC104, SpaceWire) to avoid size redundancy caused by customized interfaces. Standardized interfaces also simplify connections between the OBC and other subsystems, reducing wiring weight.
  4. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMI) Consideration: Lightweight design must simultaneously ensure EMI shielding performance. For example, add a thin shielding layer (e.g., copper foil) inside the housing to prevent the OBC’s electromagnetic signals from interfering with other subsystems and to protect the OBC from external interference.
 
In short, the OBC’s weight and size are not "the smaller and lighter the better." Instead, they must strictly adapt to the satellite platform specifications, striking a balance between "lightweight," "miniaturization," "reliability," and "expandability.

Se vi interesiĝas pri niaj produktoj, vi povas elekti lasi viajn informojn ĉi tie, kaj ni baldaŭ kontaktos vin.